Color:
[0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Black Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 20000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [Oppor_Area] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[0, 112, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Black Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 20000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [Oppor_Area] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[255, 167, 127, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Black Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 20000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [Oppor_Area] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[254, 192, 213, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Black Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 20000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [Oppor_Area] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[115, 38, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Black Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This layer represents the freight and passenger rail lines as depicted in Figure 7.5 in the General Plan 2035. The source of the data is the Los Angeles County Integrated Waste Management Plan, Annual Report, 2009. Current information about this plan can be found here. For more detailed metadata for the rail data can be found here (DRP Drobo): W:\PROJECTS_ARCHIVE\general_plan\support\railmetadata3_3_06.pdf
Description: The Hillside Management areas are identified as areas of having 25% or greater slope, and this layer shows that using the Digital Elevation Model as extracted in 2006 by the LAR-IAC project. The resolution of this dataset is 5 feet for the urban areas, and 20 feet for the National Forest area. For the Castaic CSD and Santa Monica Mountains, the slope is broken down into two categories: 25 - 50% slope, and 50% or greater slope due to those ordinances / plans having those additional requirements. For more information about the countywide Hillside Management Ordinance, click here.
Description: This layer represents the parks as depicted in Figures 10.2 and 10.3 in the General Plan 2035. This layer depicts Community, Neighborhood, and Pocket parks, and relates to the Service Area Radii as created by the Department of Parks and Recreation.
Copyright Text: Department of Parks and Recreation.
Color:
[76, 230, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This layer represents the park service area radii as depicted in Figures 10.2 and 10.3 in the General Plan 2035. This layer depicts Community, Neighborhood, and Pocket parks, and relates to the Service Area Radii as created by the Department of Parks and Recreation.
Copyright Text: Department of Parks and Recreation.
Color:
[230, 152, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 50000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [RADIUS_TYPE] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[168, 168, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 50000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [RADIUS_TYPE] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[0, 168, 132, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 50000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [RADIUS_TYPE] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[197, 0, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 50000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [RADIUS_TYPE] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[132, 0, 168, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: State Law requires the creation of Airport Land Use Commissions (ALUCs) to coordinate planning for the areas surrounding public use airports. In Los Angeles County the Regional Planning Commission has the responsibility for acting as the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and for coordinating the airport planning of public agencies within the county. UPDATE HISTORY:4/8/13 with new schema that has the name of the airport, CNEL class, currency of the data and source (original 1991 study, or has updated noise contours).4/30/13 - modified Fox Field to match CAD data from consultant (see 'outside_entities/other_agencies/ALUC')
Description: This layer represents the roadway noise contours as depicted on Figure 11.2 in the General Plan 2035, and Section 5.12 Noise and Vibration, and Appendix K of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (http://planning.lacounty.gov/generalplan/ceqa)
Description: This layer represents the landfills as depicted in Figure 12.6 in the General Plan 2035. Description courtesy of LA County DPW Disaster Routes website (http://dpw.lacounty.gov/dsg/disasterroutes/) : Disaster Routes play a primary role in disaster response and recovery. During a disaster and immediately following, Disaster Routes are used to transport emergency equipment, supplies and personnel into an affected area. Disaster Routes are also utilized by fire, emergency medical services and others involved with public safety for life saving measures. Knowing the status of the routes benefits all jurisdictions in the Operational Area by saving valuable time and minimizing last minute rerouting. Each jurisdiction is responsible for reporting road closures and road damages in their area. Disaster routes have priority for clearing, repairing and restoration over all other roads.
Description: This layer represents the fire battalions as depicted in Figure 12.7 in the General Plan 2035. LA County Fire Facilities include Fire Camps, Fire Stations, Battalion HQ, Division HQ, and Regional HQ. For more information, please see Fire Department website: http://www.fire.lacounty.gov/
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County Fire Department
Description: This layer represents the fire battalions as depicted in Figure 12.7 in the General Plan 2035. LA County Fire Department Service Areas are divided into 9 divisions, and 22 battalions. For more information, please see Fire Department website: http://www.fire.lacounty.gov/
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County Fire Department
Description: PRC 4201 - 4204 and Govt. Code 51175-89 direct the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to map areas of significant fire hazards based on fuels, terrain, weather, and other relevant factors. These zones, referred to as Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ), define the application of various mitigation strategies to reduce risk associated with wildland fires. CAL FIRE is remapping Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) for State Responsibility Areas (SRA) and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) recommendations in Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) to provide updated map zones, based on new data, science, and technology. This specific dataset provides FHSZs within SRA lands only, and represents the proposed zones, subject to changes based on local hearings. A subsequent dataset release will provide the actual adopted zones. Maps of the proposed zones in SRA are available at: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/projects/hazard/fhz.html More information about the project can be found at: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/projects/hazard/hazard.htmlUPDATED - 3/5/15 by taking out any reference to Responsibility Area - that now is in a seperate, more updated layer. Per. Alfie Blanch, this layer should not have any reference to Federal, State, or Local Responsibility Areas. Also, internal slivers were filled in by doing a 'Gap topology analysis.'
Copyright Text: CAL FIRE recoginzes the important contribution of various local government entities that contributed data, maps, and comments that were critical components of the FHSZ mapping process.
Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [HAZ_CLASS] CONCAT " Fire Hazard" Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 40000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [HAZ_CLASS] CONCAT " Fire Hazard" Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 40000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [HAZ_CLASS] CONCAT " Fire Hazard" Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This dataset (SRA14_1) represents our initial determination of SRA status as of 7/1/14. After comparing SRA parcels to assessor roll files, a final determination of SRA status as of 7/1/14 will be reflected in SRA14_2. SRA14_1 includes numerous annexations affecting SRA status that have occurred since 7/1/2013. If we are notified of additional annexations that are effective prior to 7/1/14, they will be reflected in SRA14_2. SRA14_1 also includes numerous changes identified during the 2013 DPA Review process, primarily newly acquired federal lands such as the Coast Dairy BLM acquisition, National Park Service additions, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service acquisitions. Finally, work was done to address topology errors between SRA14_1 and Incorp14_1 (incorporated cities). This typically eliminated slivers of SRA that extended into city boundaries, or LRA slivers between cities and SRA lands that were changed to SRA. These changes should not result in adding additional parcels or habitable structures into SRA. ADDED to SDE on 3/5/15 after clipping with HAZ_CA_FIRE_HAZARDS.
Copyright Text: Numerous federal agencies have provided data that help us to identify FRA lands (BLM, U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs).
Description: Iterative layers that produce the final flood zone analysis for the Safety Element of the General Plan. This will be a list of parcels / cases / streets, as well as accompanying maps. The numbered list below corresponds to the number in the naming convention:Exported from the unincorporated parcels (current as of February, 2014) that are being used as part of the Master Parcel List update. Also has fields that identify which parcels have structures on it ; this information is from both the 2008 GIS Building Outline layer and the parcels with a Year Built of greater than or equal to 2008 (for these parcels, it was checked against the imagery if there was a structure in the Flood Plain).2008 Buildings (from LAR-IAC2) selected out by FEMA Flood Zones.Layer 2 buildings clipped by the Flood Zones.Converted Layer 3 to points. Selected out from Layer 1 where there were no LAR-IAC Buildings, but Assessor showed there were structures; converted to points, moved to physical location of strucuture, and added those points to this layer as well. Near function will be applied to this for final map.Clipped CASE_INFORMATION layer from SDE by Flood Zones. Added some fields to flag those cases that did not have a decision date, or had a decision date after 1980; any cases with a decision date before 1980 were deleted.Selected out certain case types from layer 5 (see email from Soyeon on 3/18/14), and only those that were Approved.Clipped out SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY for flood zones - added 'CASE_' field so it can be joined to the Cases layer later..Converted layers 6 and 7 to points - added 'Source' field to identify the GIS source of each. Removed a couple points that were duplicate case numbers between the cases and subdivisions. Deleted those within Incorporated Cities.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Class Breaks Renderer: Field: NEAR_DIST Min. Value: 8.25914223565 ClassBreakInfos:
Class Maximum Value: 50 Label: Structures within 50 feet of each other Description: Structures within 50 feet of each other
9,752 structures total Symbol:
Class Maximum Value: 500 Label: Structures within 50 - 1000 feet of each other Description: Structures within 50 - 1000 feet of each other
11,829 structures total Symbol:
Class Maximum Value: 31050.4725099 Label: Structures greater than 1000 feet of each other Description: Structures greater than 1000 feet of each other
237 structures total Symbol:
Description: This layer represents the 'Hazard, Environmental and Resource Constraints Map' as depicted in the appendix Figure C.1 in the General Plan 2035. The Constraints were compiled by overlaying many different layers that each had a score attached to them. Class 1 being the least severe, and Class 3 being most severe. In the overlay analysis the maximum number for overlapping polygons is the one shown (so even if there are 3 Class 1 polygons and 1 Class 3 polygon in a specific area, that area will get a 3). For more information about how these constraints are classified, please consult Appendix C in the General Plan appendix section (click here).
Description: This layer is a combination of the Buildout for the General Plan 2035 and the Antelope Valley Area Plan, that was generated for the EIRs for both plans. The Board of Supervisors adopted both the Antelope Valley Area Plan and General Plan 2035 on 6/16/15 and 10/6/15, respectively. The Antelope Valley Area Plan contained the buildout for Antelope Valley which has the projected buildout to 2035. The buildout for the General Plan 2035 contained the projected buildout to 2035 as well as the buildout according to the adopted Land Use Policy of all the other Community / Area Plan, so it is important to note that only the areas covered by the General Plan and Antelope Valley Area Plan contain projections to the year 2035. Please see the 'PLAN_NAME' field for those areas covered by the plans listed below:Altadena Community Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 1986Antelope Valley Area Plan - Projected for 2035East Los Angeles Community Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 1988General Plan 2035 - Projected for 2035Hacienda Heights Community Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 2011Malibu Coastal Zone - Uses Plan from 1986 (during GP update process, this plan was updated, but didn't make it into the GP EIR)Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 2012Rowland Heights Community Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 1981Santa Catalina Island - Uses Adopted Plan from 1983Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 2012Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 2000Twin Lakes Community Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 1991Walnut Park Neighborhood Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 1987West Athens - Westmont Community Plan - Uses Adopted Plan from 1990In this layer there are the various density factors that went into calculating the final number. The fields depicting UNITS, POP, and EMP (Housing Units, Population, Employment / Jobs) will be of the most interest to people.A detailed methodology document is available in the EIR of both the Antelope Valley Area Plan and General Plan 2035, direct links are below:Appendix E of Antelope Valley EIR - click hereAppendix D of General Plan 2035 EIR - click here
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section;
The Planning Center;
Santa Clarita - "One Valley, One Vision"
