Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Interim and supportive housing projects (current and pipeline), as of 07/31/22. This was downloaded from a VIEW layer on ArcGIS Online on 6/6/23.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">IMPORTANT NOTE- if this layer is to be used in any public-facing app or map, it must be set to not display </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">in beyond</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">1:80,000 due to privacy concerns.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This data is a subset of the Elderly Care Facilities provided by the State of CA's Dept of Social Services. The original data provided by the state was in the form of a spreadsheet which was tweaked to only include active facilities within LA County only. The addresses in the spreadsheet were then mapped. The data is from June 2023. This layer is important because elderly care facilities are identified as a sensitive use.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: State of California Dept of Social Services; LA County Planning
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This 'Hospitals' layer comes from SCAG originally and was used in the EJSM Hazard Proximity and Sensitive Uses analysis. For more information about this analysis, please consult the documentation in the following directory:</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>..\GIS\PROJECTS\DRP_ADVANCE_PLANNING\general_plan\support\Environmental_Justice\GZ_Final_Deliverables_Documentation</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>DATA CURRENT AS OF 2017.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">UPDATE HISTORY:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN>12/13/18 - recieved .zip file from EJSM consultant</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">1/18/19 - imported into EJSM_scoring.gdb</SPAN></P></LI></UL></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: The Environmental Justice Screening Method was developed by Rachel Morello-Frosch, Manuel Pastor, and James Sadd in 2007. The EJSM was updated for Los Angeles County by James Sadd and Madeline Wander in 2018. SCAG General Plan (2017)
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>These are the residential zoning and specific plan categories that were generated from a Green Zones sensitive uses output on 9/28/21. </SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County, Assessor, eGIS
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This is a layer of parcels within 1,000 feet of unincorporated areas. Residential uses was extracted from the Assessor parcels for UseType = 'Residential' (excluding vacant parcels). Additionally, parcels with UseType = 'Government' And OwnerName LIKE "Housing" were added (July, 2022). It was then dissolved to form the block faces; the 'create multi-part polygons' was not checked. Also, there are no additional attribute information, just blocks.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Update History:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN>2/7/17 - extracted Residential uses from parcel base and dissolved.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>12/3/18 - extracted Residential uses from parcels that were current as of 11/28/18. In this query, vacant parcels were not included (UseType = 'Residential' AND UseCode NOT LIKE '%V').</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>7/3/22 - updated data layer with parcels from June, 2022, this time only including parcels within 1,000 feet of an unincorporated area (previous versions were countywide). Also, Government Housing was added.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">7/5/22 - removed one parcel (7351033901 - near West Carson) as that is owned by the LA Housing Authority, however, it is an adminstrative building, it is not actual housing.</SPAN></P></LI></UL></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County, Assessor, eGIS
Name: Residential (A-1 and A-2 with existing Res Use)
Display Field: Z_CATEGORY
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Imported into SDE on 12/12/18 - from the following layer in the 'General Plan / Environmental Justice' database: OrdAnalysisProximity_06_parcels_A1_A2_INT_DIS. Below is the original metadata for that layer (#6 below).</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>These iterative layers are part of a proximity analysis as requested by the General Plan section to assist with writing the Green Zones ordinance and determining where zone changes should go (HelpDesk ticket #805650). The following Industrial Zones were considered and intersected with parcels: C-M, M-1, M-1.5, M-2, M-2.5, MPD. Then a 'near' analysis was done within a 1,000' search radius against various sensitive uses. This layer was then used in ArcGIS Pro to publish a hosted layer to be used in a web mapping application for visualization.</SPAN></P><OL><LI><P><SPAN>Selected parcels for industrial zones</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>Intesected layer 1 with selected zoning categories....deleted slivers</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>Dissolved layer 2 on selected fields and exported to SDE for use in the app. THIS IS THE LAYER THAT THE NEAR ANALYSIS WAS DONE ON. After the Near Analysis, the polygons were exported into points - both points and polygon layers are necessary in the app for the zoom levels.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>Near tables used to join back to layer 3 for the NearDistance fields.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>Look up tables for residential zoning and specific plan categories used in the sensitive uses map service for the app.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>Intersection between A-1 and A-2 zoning with parcels - for an additional analysis of residential zoning. Added a field that flags which parcels have residential uses that are notvacant.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Selected out 'occupied residential uses' from layer 6 and dissolved on Z_CATEGORY. This was exported into the sensitive uses map service, and also used in the additional near analysis request.</SPAN></P></LI></OL><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This is a layer of Retirement Communities that is intended to follow the outline of the parcel upon which it resides. It was extracted from Assessor data using the UseDescription "Homes for the Aged and Others". Layer has schema from both Assessor and Land Types with a field called 'GIS_LAYER_SOURCE' indicating the data source and date generated.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Next Steps</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">2/8/17 - Any other sources out there? A list somewhere of licensed Retirement homes?</SPAN></P></LI></UL><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Update History:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN>2/7/17 - Extracted from parcels.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">10/25/17 - Added 'Senior Services' from eGIS LAND_TYPES layer.</SPAN></P></LI></UL></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This is a layer of Libraries that is intended to follow the outline of the building outline with a 10 foot buffer to smoothe out the edges. It originally came from the analysis done by DRP in 2010 for Jessica's Law, and LMS was used to join the spatial attributes to it. It has a field called 'GIS_LAYER_SOURCE' indicating the data source and date generated.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Next Steps</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN /></P></LI></UL><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Update History:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">2/8/17 - Combined Building Outlines and LMS data and applied 10 foot buffer to building outline.</SPAN></P></LI></UL></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County, Assessor, eGIS
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This is a layer of K - 12 Schools that is intended to follow the outline of the parcel upon which the it resides. It is a combination of a point layer that was geocoded from the Department of Education (DOE) from February, 2017, and the selected parcel from which it intersected. The DOE updates their public schools list weekly, and the private schools once a year. Original downloads can be found in 'OUTSIDE_ENTITIES\Other_Agencies\CA_Dept_of_Education. The eGIS Land Types layer was merged with it as the 'point-to-parcel' selection didn't get every parcel within the school. Additionally, the layer from the Jessica's Law analysis was used to get any schools that were missed. Below is a description of the Jessica's Law methodology:</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Jessica's Law Analysis: </SPAN><SPAN>The primary data source for this 2011 layer came from the 2008 Jessica’s Law project performed for the Board of Supervisors. That project pulled coded information from parcel data and checked it against existing Thomas Bros. data and Los Angeles Region Imagery Acquisition Consortium (LAR-IAC) 4” resolution aerial imagery. A further step was taken with the layer by comparing it with information from the Los Angeles County Enterprise GIS Repository, the Los Angeles Times California School Guide website, and by using ortho and oblique aerial imagery, and street level imagery to verify the accuracy of the data. Last update: January 2011.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-size:12pt">Below is a description of the fields, as well as the update history and next steps:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">AIN - </SPAN><SPAN>Assessor's Parcel ID</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">CDS_Code</SPAN><SPAN>- for schools from DOE, this is the unique identifier for each school. DOE separates the two lists between public and private, so this field can be used in both lists (ie. for future updates or quality checking.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">FullAddress</SPAN><SPAN>- this is the address that came from DOE. Any school with a source of "Jessica's Law" or 'eGIS LAND TYPES" will not have this field.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">SCHOOL_NAME</SPAN><SPAN>- Name of the school.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">SOURCE_NOTES</SPAN><SPAN>- states where this school came from (DOE, Jessica's Law analysis, or eGIS LAND_TYPES).</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">SCHOOL_TYPE - </SPAN><SPAN>this is the type of school (elementary, HS, etc.). There is not a consistency with naming within this field as this layer came from multiple sources. This will have to be cleaned up eventually.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">QC_NOTES - </SPAN><SPAN>This states whether a school is within unincorporated or within 1,000 feet of unincorporated. For QC purposes, this 'Unin + 1000 foot buffer' area was focused on due to time constraints for using this layer for the Cannabis Ordinance.</SPAN></P></LI></UL><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Update History:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN>2/7/17 - Combined Land Types and geocoded 'point-to-parcel' layers.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>6/27/17 - added Jessica's law polygons and QC'd areas within unincorporated + 1,000 feet. Should also get latest schools at some point.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">7/19/22 - added new schools within 1,000 feet of unincorporated areas based on data downloaded from </SPAN><A href="https://gis.data.ca.gov:443/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">California State Geoportal</SPAN></A><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;"> (California Schools 2020 - 2021 dataset). Also deleted a couple schools that are closed.</SPAN></P></LI></UL><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN STYLE="font-size:12pt">This is a layer of Parks that is intended to follow the outline of the parcel upon which it resides. This layer came from the Department of Parks and Rec 'Parks Needs Assessment' for TYPE = "Local Park". This type distinguishes developed parks from the large regional parks or natural areas, as a sensitive use is focused on parks with playgrounds and other amenities where children would be present. Additional work was done to add polygons from our 2010-2012 Jessica's Law analysis to capture additional parks and sports complexes not covered by the Parks Needs Assessment (with the exception of Golf Courses). A 'SOURCE' field was added to distinguish these two sources. Below is a brief description of the Jessica's Law methodology:</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;font-size:12pt">Jessica's Law methodology</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-size:12pt">: The basis for the 2011 parks data layer began with the State of California’s Protected Areas Database (CPAD) in conjunction with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) existing land use layers from 2005 and 2008. These data layers were cross checked against one another for spatial accuracy and verified with ortho and oblique aerial imagery, and street level imagery. Last update: January 2011. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-size:12pt">Source: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-size:12pt">State of California, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Thomas Bros. Map Company, Google Maps, Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning, Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Update History:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">2/7/17 - Extracted layer from Parks Needs Assessment.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">6/19/17 - Added additional polygons from Jessica's Law analysis, did QC on these</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">5/24/2023 - Downloaded protected areas data (CPAD) from calands.org. Extracted the local parks and appended any new park data to our existing parks dataset.</SPAN></P></LI></UL><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Next Steps</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN>2/8/17 - Compare with Jessica's Law layer - some parks in this layer cover undeveloped park area. </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">DONE</SPAN></P></LI></UL></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County, Assessor, eGIS, SCAG, Google, Thomas Bros (from 2010-2012 analysis), California Protected Areas Database
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Address data was downloaded from State Department of Social Services on 6/22/2017. Closed and inactive facilities were filtered out and the remainder geocoded. Addresses that did not geocode adequately in either Google or Bing were checked manually by searching for the facilities by name to place the points. To create this layer, parcels underlying the points were selected. Several hundred addresses were not on parcels. Only those in an unincorporated area or within 1000' of an unincorporated area were manually corrected to the appropriate parcel. Approximately 150 points ourside these zones are street interpolations requiring update.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: State of CA Department of Social Services
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This is a countywide layer of individual 1,000-foot buffers surrounding schools, library buildings, parks, and child care center parcels. These sensitive uses are featured in four separate layers. Using ModelBuilder, a temporary layer of 1,000-foot buffers was created from the polygon features of each layer and then merged together to create this single layer of combined individual buffers.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Model Reference: \\rpfile01\GIS\PROJECTS\DRP_OTHER_GROUPS\Sensitive_Uses\Sensitive_Uses.tbx / Sens_Use_Buffer_1K</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Created on 06-01-2023</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Update History:</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning | GIS Section
