Description: Established in 1982, Government Code Section 65570 mandates FMMP to biennially report on the conversion of farmland and grazing land, and to provide maps and data to local government and the public.
Copyright Text: A citation for the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program on any map products, graphic media, or data analyses based on the data is appreciated.
Description: The Countywide building outline dataset contains building outlines (over 3,000,000) for all buildings greater than 300 square feet in Los Angeles County, including building height, building area, and the parcel number (also known as building footprints). The data was captured from stereo imagery as part of the LAR-IAC5 Project (2017 acquisition), used to update the 2014 building outlines dataset.The buildings were generated using stereo imagery.
Copyright Text: LARIAC, County of Los Angeles, Pictometry, EagleView
Description: This dataset contains address points from the Countywide Address Management System, a collaborative program between the County’s Registrar/Recorder, Chief Information Officer, Public Works Department, Department of Regional Planning, and many local cities to manage addresses and street centerlines for the purposes of geocoding and cartography. More information about this layer can be found on the eGIS Data Repository data layer page.What this data is (and isn’t)This dataset contains the best available information, with close to 3 million primary and secondary addresses in the County of Los Angeles. It does NOT include information about every unit, suite, building, and sub-address. With probably over 7 million addresses, we have a ways to go.DescriptionThis dataset includes over 2.9 million individual points for addresses in the County. Data has been compiled from best available sources, including city databases, LA County Assessor parcels, and the County’s House Numbering maps. Please see the Source field for information.Street Name information has been split into multiple fields to support the County’s specifically designed geocoders – please see the entry on LA County Specific Locators and Matching rules for more information.Multi-address ParcelsSome of our data sources (LA City, LA County, for example) have mapped each individual address in their city. These may also show unit information for an address point. A property with multiple addresses will show a point for each address. For some cities where this has not happened, the data source is the Assessor, where the primary address of the property may be the only address shown. We invite cities and sources with more detailed information to join the CAMS consortium to continue to improve the data.Legal vs. Postal CitiesMany users confuse the name the Post Office delivers main to (e.g. Van Nuys, Hollywood) as a legal city (in this case Los Angeles), when they are a postal city. The County contains 88 legal cities, and over 400 postal names that are tied to the zipcodes. To support useability and geocoding, we have attached the first 3 postal cities to each address, based upon its zipcocode.
Copyright Text: Mark Greninger
Geographic Information Officer
County of Los Angeles
Internal Services Department
350 South Figueroa St
Suite 188
Los Angeles, CA 90071
mgreninger@isd.lacounty.gov
(213) 253-5624
Description: This is the outcome of a multi-step process in which parcels were selected and intersected with Land Use Policy and Zoning. Also, taxroll information was appended as well as overlays from several districts and constraints model layers. The parcels used were from February, 2012. In the 'working layers' geodatabase, there are all the iterations of the parcel layer as various analyses were done (file naming has letter prefixes to denote the order of layers created). In the summary folder of this directory, a methodology write-up was begun, but it is incomplete as it was found that some of the processes didn't quite work as they should. TOPOLOGICAL INTEGRITY NEEDS TO BE EMPLOYED to reduce the time spend on this type of analysis. Also, some sort of MODELING PROCEDURES need to be worked on to help streamline this process! The resulting spreadsheet was sent to the General Plan section on 8/9/12, and can be found in the 'support' folder. IMPORTANT NOTE - 'parcel_analysis_2012_unin_taxroll' table links to this layer as it has several Taxroll fields. This seperate table is necessary as it makes this layer more usable for editing (too big of a file size otherwise). UPDATE HISTORY: 12/4/12 for latest recommended changes in the Proposed Antelope Valley plan. 12/5/12 for latest annexations (9/11/12, 11/28/12).1/3/13 - for 'Batch 5' changes for zoning consistancy in Town & Country1/9/13 - for 'Batch 6' changes for zoning consistancy and BRC recommendations in Town & Country1/17/13 - minor Proposed LUP update for General Plan - updated Adopted Density / FAR for all parcels2/26/13 - finalized remaining changes for Town & Country3/18/13 - finished QC of parcels (deleting / merging slivers, adjusting for parcel shifts, comparing LU with public / privately owned parcels) for the AV, GP areas. QC began 3/6/13.3/20/13 - incorporated latest Zone Changes in Acton from CSN for Town & Country.
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning - GIS Section
Los Angeles County Assessor's Office
Description: PRC 4201 - 4204 and Govt. Code 51175-89 direct the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to map areas of significant fire hazards based on fuels, terrain, weather, and other relevant factors. These zones, referred to as Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ), define the application of various mitigation strategies to reduce risk associated with wildland fires. CAL FIRE is remapping Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) for State Responsibility Areas (SRA) and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) recommendations in Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) to provide updated map zones, based on new data, science, and technology. This specific dataset provides FHSZs within SRA lands only, and represents the proposed zones, subject to changes based on local hearings. A subsequent dataset release will provide the actual adopted zones. Maps of the proposed zones in SRA are available at: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/projects/hazard/fhz.html More information about the project can be found at: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/projects/hazard/hazard.htmlUPDATED - 3/5/15 by taking out any reference to Responsibility Area - that now is in a seperate, more updated layer. Per. Alfie Blanch, this layer should not have any reference to Federal, State, or Local Responsibility Areas. Also, internal slivers were filled in by doing a 'Gap topology analysis.'
Copyright Text: CAL FIRE recoginzes the important contribution of various local government entities that contributed data, maps, and comments that were critical components of the FHSZ mapping process.
Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [HAZ_CLASS] CONCAT " Fire Hazard" Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 40000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [HAZ_CLASS] CONCAT " Fire Hazard" Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 40000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [HAZ_CLASS] CONCAT " Fire Hazard" Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This layer shows all incorporated and unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. The incorporated city boundaries are maintained by the Department of Public Works as part of the cadastral landbase, and reflects the most current annexations as of the date listed below. The unincorporated areas are maintained by the Department of Regional Planning for land use planning efforts. This layer was updated on 7/28/22 to match a major city boundary update from Public Works (see update history below). A hosted feature layer is located here.UPDATE HISTORY (beginning 2015)1/5/15 - Re-orginization between Torrance and Rolling Hills Estates4/22/15 - Annexation to Los Angeles from Florence-Firestone (Jordan Downs)6/9/15 - updated 'Adopted Date' for Santa Clarita Valley (wasn't done before!)6/17/15 - following the adoption of the Antelope Valley Area Plan update, the boundary between Santa Clarita Valley and AV was updated, as well as the boundary between Kagel / Lopez Canyons and Antelope Valley.8/31/15 - updated Universal City for Reorganization 2014-01.11/5/15 - updated following the General Plan 2035 going into effect. Boundary change for Kagel / Lopez Canoyns, South San Gabriel / Whittier Narrows, and added boundary for Pepperdine University.3/17/16 - following an Assessor adjustment of parcel #3022012017, city boundary between Palmdale and AV was adjusted. Informed DPW as well.4/21/16 - updated San Clemente Island to match what DPW had (compared to imagery, ours was shifted). Also a re-orginization between the cities of Rolling Hills Estates, Rolling Hills, and Rancho Palos Verdes. Links to both are here (document 1, document 2).11/15/16 - Updated for annexation to Santa Clarita that became effective on this day (link to official annexation document is here). Also, updates that resulted from a comprehensive city boundary update after comparison with Public Works' city boundary layer.4/19/17 - Updated for reorganization between the cities of Pomona and Diamond Bar (click here).2/5/18 - Updated for reorganization between the cities of Monrovia and Bradbury (click here).11/20/18 - Updated for RPPL 2017005805 (adopted 10/30/18) for re-alignments between the unincorporated communities of Santa Clarita Valley and Antelope Valley (for plan amendment, click here).11/21/18 - updated for Plum Canyon / Skyline Ranch / North Sand Canyon Annexation. This annexation was effective on 11/15/18, and a link to the official LAFCO annexation document is here.1/29/19 - updated for South Walnut / Pomona annexation, which was effective on 1/16/19. A link to the official LAFCO annexation document is here.5/28/19 - updated for detachment from city of Los Angeles to Del Aire. Effective 5/16/19, and a link to the official LAFCO annexation document is here.7/25/19 - updated for annexation and detachment from the city of Arcadia to South Monrovia Islands and East Pasadena-East San Gabriel, respectively. Effective 6/13/19, and a link to the official LAFCO annexation document is here.1/28/21 - updated a couple errors in the data - Date Adopted for the Florence-Firestone Community Plan, and updated Type for Walnut Park to 'NEIGH' (character length limit).1/26/22 - updated the Twin Lakes / Oat Mountain community boundary through zoning conflation project. This is to follow the updated parcels along the southern Twin Lakes border.4/12/22 - updated Gilmore Island as it was found to be 5 feet too wide on the easterly boundary. Consulted with Assesor and Public Works for confirmation.5/23/22 - updated the boundary between Twin Lakes and Oat Mountain to account for a parcel shift as identified by the Zoning Conflation project.7/28/22 - major update to all city boundaries in the entire county based on an update from Public Works. Several city boundaries were updated to follow parcels, with the majority of changes being slivers, or very minor shifts. The coastline was the major adjustment and used the latest data from NOAA.8/17/22 - boundary adjustment between Industry and North Whittier per DPW update (APN 8125021943).
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning, Department of Public Works, Asssessor's Office
Description: Using the data layers for Sensitive Uses that were used in the Green Zones ordinance, these are the 500' buffers from sensitive uses within Green Zone Districts. Sensitive Uses include schools, dwelling units, playgrounds, nursing homes, hospitals and licensed day care facilities.UPDATE HISTORY:1/20/22 - Layer created6/1/22 - Layer was updated to remove non-conforming residential Assessor uses from within an industrial zone, which reduced some of the buffers within Avocado Heights, East Los Angeles, West Rancho Dominguez-Victoria, and Willowbrook.7/5/22 - Added one additional school that was missed previously (a High School and Charter School within SW Comm College in W. Athens), and added to the buffering there.
Description: The Hillside Management areas are identified as areas of having 25% or greater slope, and this layer shows that using the Digital Elevation Model as extracted in 2006 by the LAR-IAC project. The resolution of this dataset is 5 feet for the urban areas, and 20 feet for the National Forest area. For the Castaic CSD and Santa Monica Mountains, the slope is broken down into two categories: 25 - 50% slope, and 50% or greater slope due to those ordinances / plans having those additional requirements. For more information about the countywide Hillside Management Ordinance, click here.
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN>This layer identifies historic resources and their attributes located in unincorporated areas or on County owned land. This is an update to the previous version of Historic Resources that was done in February and March of 2024. The previous version also contained State and National Historic sites, however, that information was very incomplete, and because of that, these sites were removed. This updated layer contains only the County recognized sites, and consists of the following:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">County Adopted Landmarks </SPAN><SPAN>- these are identified in the </SPAN><A href="https://file.lacounty.gov:443/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/Registry.pdf" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>County Register</SPAN></A><SPAN>.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">County Proposed or Eligible Districts </SPAN><SPAN>- not yet officially adopted.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">County Historic Context Statements, Historic Surveys and Preservation programs </SPAN><SPAN>- these are identified on the Historic Preservation > Resources </SPAN><A href="https://planning.lacounty.gov:443/long-range-planning/historic-preservation-program/resources/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>site</SPAN></A><SPAN>.</SPAN></P></LI></UL><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN>For more information, please visit the Historic Preservation Program </SPAN><A href="https://planning.lacounty.gov:443/long-range-planning/historic-preservation-program/resources/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>site</SPAN></A><SPAN>.</SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN /></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN /></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">UPDATE HISTORY:</SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN /></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN>1/13/22 - added 'Holmes House' in Altadena that was adopted by the BOS on 2/9/21.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>6/23/22 - added 'Unique Theatre' (County landmark), and 'Chicano Moratorium March August 29, 1970' (State and Fed district) - both in East Los Angeles.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>7/26/22 - added 'Jackie Robinson Park' (County landmark) in Antelope Valley. Adopted by the BOS on 6/14/22.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>8/1/23 - 'Pearson House' (County landmark) in Altadena was adopted by the BOS on 7/25/23.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>1/2/24 - updated boundary for 'Jackie Robinson Park' to match what was adopted by BOS (was missing the eastern parcel when originally created).</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>2/24 - 3/34 - added several historic context statements and surveys</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>3/26/24 - removed state and federal sites due to incomplete information.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>4/2/24 - added to the Department of Regional Planning's production database (SDE).</SPAN></P></LI></UL><P STYLE="font-style:italic;margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
Zoning Permits East / GIS Section
Description: IntroductionThis metadata is broken up into different sections that provide both a high-level summary of the Housing Element and more detailed information about the data itself with links to other resources. The following is an excerpt from the Executive Summary from the Housing Element 2021 – 2029 document:The County of Los Angeles is required to ensure the availability of residential sites, at adequate densities and appropriate development standards, in the unincorporated Los Angeles County to accommodate its share of the regional housing need--also known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Unincorporated Los Angeles County has been assigned a RHNA of 90,052 units for the 2021-2029 Housing Element planning period, which is subdivided by level of affordability as follows:Extremely Low / Very Low (<50% AMI) - 25,648Lower (50 - 80% AMI) - 13,691Moderate (80 - 120% AMI) - 14,180Above Moderate (>120% AMI) - 36,533Total - 90,052NOTES - Pursuant to State law, the projected need of extremely low income households can be estimated at 50% of the very low income RHNA. Therefore, the County’s projected extremely low income can be estimated at 12,824 units. However, for the purpose of identifying adequate sites for RHNA, no separate accounting of sites for extremely low income households is required. AMI = Area Median IncomeDescriptionThe Sites Inventory (Appendix A) is comprised of vacant and underutilized sites within unincorporated Los Angeles County that are zoned at appropriate densities and development standards to facilitate housing development. The Sites Inventory was developed specifically for the County of Los Angeles, and has built-in features that filter sites based on specific criteria, including access to transit, protection from environmental hazards, and other criteria unique to unincorporated Los Angeles County. Other strategies used within the Sites Inventory analysis to accommodate the County’s assigned RHNA of 90,052 units include projected growth of ADUs, specific plan capacity, selected entitled projects, and capacity or planned development on County-owned sites within cities. This accounts for approximately 38 percent of the RHNA. The remaining 62 percent of the RHNA is accommodated by sites to be rezoned to accommodate higher density housing development (Appendix B).Caveats:This data is a snapshot in time, generally from the year 2021. It contains information about parcels, zoning and land use policy that may be outdated. The Department of Regional Planning will be keeping an internal tally of sites that get developed or rezoned to meet our RHNA goals, and we may, in the future, develop some public facing web applications or dashboards to show the progress. There may even be periodic updates to this GIS dataset as well, throughout this 8-year planning cycle.Update History:5/31/22 – Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted the Housing Element on 5/17/22, and it received final certification from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on 5/27/22. Data layer published on 5/31/22.Links to other resources:Department of Regional Planning Housing Page - Contains Housing Element and it's AppendicesHousing Element Update - Rezoning Program Story Map (English, and Spanish)Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) - Regional Housing Needs AssessmentCalifornia Department of Housing and Community Development Housing Element pageField Descriptions:OBJECTID - Internal GIS IDAIN - Assessor Identification Number*SitusAddress - Site Address (Street and Number) from Assessor Data*Use Code - Existing Land Use Code (corresponds to Use Type and Use Description) from Assessor Data*Use Type - Existing Land Use Type from Assessor Data*Use Description - Existing Land Use Description from Assessor Data*Vacant / Nonvacant – Parcels that are vacant or non-vacant per the Use Code from the Assessor Data*Units Total - Total Existing Units from Assessor Data*Max Year - Maximum Year Built from Assessor Data*Supervisorial District (2021) - LA County Board of Supervisor DistrictSubmarket Area - Inclusionary Housing Submarket AreaPlanning Area - Planning Areas from the LA County Department of Regional Planning General Plan 2035Community Name - Unincorporated Community NamePlan Name - Land Use Plan Name from the LA County Department of Regional Planning (General Plan and Area / Community Plans)LUP - 1 - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Land Use Policy (in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 1 (% area) - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Land Use Policy (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 2 - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Land Use Policy (in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 2 (% area) - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Land Use Policy (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 3 - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Land Use Policy (in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 3 (% area) - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Land Use Policy (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*Current LUP (Description) – This is a brief description of the land use category. In the case of multiple land uses, this would be the land use category that covers the majority of the parcel*Current LUP (Min Density - net or gross) - Minimum density for this category (as net or gross) per the Land Use Plan for this areaCurrent LUP (Max Density - net or gross) - Maximum density for this category (as net or gross) per the Land Use Plan for this areaProposed LUP – Final – The proposed land use category to increase density.Proposed LUP (Description) – Brief description of the proposed land use policy.Prop. LUP – Final (Min Density) – Minimum density for the proposed land use category.Prop. LUP – Final (Max Density) – Maximum density for the proposed land use category.Zoning - 1 - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Zone (in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 1 (% area) - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Zone (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 2 - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Zone (in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 2 (% area) - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Zone (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 3 - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Zone (in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 3 (% area) - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Zone (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Current Zoning (Description) - This is a brief description of the zoning category. In the case of multiple zoning categories, this would be the zoning that covers the majority of the parcel*Proposed Zoning – Final – The proposed zoning category to increase density.Proposed Zoning (Description) – Brief description of the proposed zoning.Acres - Acreage of parcelMax Units Allowed - Total Proposed Land Use Policy UnitsRHNA Eligible? – Indicates whether the site is RHNA Eligible or not. NOTE: This layer only shows those that are RHNA Eligible, but internal versions of this layer also show sites that were not-RHNA eligible, or removed during the development of this layer in 2020 – 2022.Very Low Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Very Low Income level as defined in the Housing ElementLow Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Low Income level as defined in the Housing ElementModerate Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Moderate Income level as defined in the Housing ElementAbove Moderate Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Above Moderate Income level as defined in the Housing ElementRealistic Capacity - Total Realistic Capacity of parcel (totaling all income levels). Several factors went into this final calculation. See the Housing Element (Links to Other Resources above) in the following locations - "Sites Inventory - Lower Income RHNA" (p. 223), and "Rezoning - Very Low / Low Income RHNA" (p231).Income Categories - Income Categories assigned to the parcel (relates to income capacity units)Lot Consolidation ID - Parcels with a unique identfier for consolidation potential (based on parcel ownership)Lot Consolidation Notes - Specific notes for consolidationConsolidation - Adjacent Parcels - All adjacent parcels that are tied to each lot consolidation IDsShape_Length - Perimeter (feet)Shape_Area - Area (sq feet)*As it existed in 2021
Name: Housing Element (2021 - 2029) - Sites Inventory
Display Field: Comm_Name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: IntroductionThis metadata is broken up into different sections that provide both a high-level summary of the Housing Element and more detailed information about the data itself with links to other resources. The following is an excerpt from the Executive Summary from the Housing Element 2021 – 2029 document:The County of Los Angeles is required to ensure the availability of residential sites, at adequate densities and appropriate development standards, in the unincorporated Los Angeles County to accommodate its share of the regional housing need--also known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Unincorporated Los Angeles County has been assigned a RHNA of 90,052 units for the 2021-2029 Housing Element planning period, which is subdivided by level of affordability as follows:Extremely Low / Very Low (<50% AMI) - 25,648Lower (50 - 80% AMI) - 13,691Moderate (80 - 120% AMI) - 14,180Above Moderate (>120% AMI) - 36,533Total - 90,052NOTES - Pursuant to State law, the projected need of extremely low income households can be estimated at 50% of the very low income RHNA. Therefore, the County’s projected extremely low income can be estimated at 12,824 units. However, for the purpose of identifying adequate sites for RHNA, no separate accounting of sites for extremely low income households is required. AMI = Area Median IncomeDescriptionThe Sites Inventory (Appendix A) is comprised of vacant and underutilized sites within unincorporated Los Angeles County that are zoned at appropriate densities and development standards to facilitate housing development. The Sites Inventory was developed specifically for the County of Los Angeles, and has built-in features that filter sites based on specific criteria, including access to transit, protection from environmental hazards, and other criteria unique to unincorporated Los Angeles County. Other strategies used within the Sites Inventory analysis to accommodate the County’s assigned RHNA of 90,052 units include projected growth of ADUs, specific plan capacity, selected entitled projects, and capacity or planned development on County-owned sites within cities. This accounts for approximately 38 percent of the RHNA. The remaining 62 percent of the RHNA is accommodated by sites to be rezoned to accommodate higher density housing development (Appendix B).Caveats:This data is a snapshot in time, generally from the year 2021. It contains information about parcels, zoning and land use policy that may be outdated. The Department of Regional Planning will be keeping an internal tally of sites that get developed or rezoned to meet our RHNA goals, and we may, in the future, develop some public facing web applications or dashboards to show the progress. There may even be periodic updates to this GIS dataset as well, throughout this 8-year planning cycle.Update History:5/31/22– Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted the Housing Element on 5/17/22, and it received final certification from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on 5/27/22. Data layer published on 5/31/22.Links to other resources:Department of Regional Planning Housing Page - Contains Housing Element and it's AppendicesHousing Element Update - Rezoning Program Story Map (English, and Spanish)Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) - Regional Housing Needs AssessmentCalifornia Department of Housing and Community Development Housing Element pageField Descriptions:OBJECTID - Internal GIS IDAIN - Assessor Identification Number*ASI Status - Sites Inventory Status (Nonvacant or Vacant)SitusAddress- Site Address (Street and Number) from Assessor Data*SitusCity - Site Address (City) from Assessor Data*SitusZIP - Site Address (ZIP) from Assessor Data*LV_IV_Ratio - Land Value to Improvement Value Ratio from Assessor Data*YearBuiltMax- Maximum Year Built from Assessor Data*Use Code - Existing Land Use Code (corresponds to Use Type and Use Description) from Assessor Data*Use Type - Existing Land Use Type from Assessor Data*Use Description - Existing Land Use Description from Assessor Data*Publicly Owned - If publicly owned, indicates whether it's Federal, State, County, or Special DistrictUnits Total - Total Existing Units from Assessor Data*Supervisorial District (2021) - LA County Board of Supervisor DistrictSubmarket Area - Inclusionary Housing Submarket AreaPlanning Area - Planning Areas from the LA County Department of Regional Planning General Plan 2035Community Name - Unincorporated Community NamePlan Name - Land Use Plan Name from the LA County Department of Regional Planning (General Plan and Area / Community Plans)Zoning - 1 - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Zone (in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 1 (% area) - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Zone (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 2 - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Zone (in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 2 (% area)- Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Zone (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 3 - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Zone (in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*Zoning - 3 (% area) - Zoning from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Zone (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one zone category present)*LUP - 1 - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Land Use Policy (in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 1 (% area) - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Land Use Policy (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 2 - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Land Use Policy (in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 2 (% area) - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Land Use Policy (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 3 - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Land Use Policy (in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*LUP - 3 (% area) - Land Use Policy from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Land Use Policy (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Land Use Policy category present)*SP - 1 - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Specific Plan (in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 1 (desc) - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Specific Plan Category Description (in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 1 (% area) - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Primary Specific Plan (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 2 - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Specific Plan (in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 2 (desc) - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Specific Plan Category Description (in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 2 (% area) - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Secondary Specific Plan (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 3 - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Specific Plan (in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 3 (desc) - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Specific Plan Category Description (in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*SP - 3 (% area) - Specific Plan from Dept. of Regional Planning - Tertiary Specific Plan (% of parcel covered in cases where there are more than one Specific Plan category present)*Acres - Acreage of parcelLUP Units - Total - Total Land Use Policy Units (note - takes into account different densities and % area covered if there are multiple categories)Current LUP (Min Density - net or gross)- Minimum density for this category (as net or gross) per the Land Use Plan for this areaCurrent LUP (Max Density - net or gross) - Maximum density for this category (as net or gross) per the Land Use Plan for this areaSite Status - Status of the site - mostly shows as 'available', but some are flagged as 'Pending Project'Very Low Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Very Low Income level as defined in the Housing ElementLow Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Low Income level as defined in the Housing ElementModerate Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Moderate Income level as defined in the Housing ElementAbove Moderate Income Capacity - Total capacity for the Above Moderate Income level as defined in the Housing ElementRealistic Capacity - Total Realistic Capacity of parcel (totaling all income levels). Several factors went into this final calculation. See the Housing Element (Links to Other Resources above) in the following locations - "Sites Inventory - Lower Income RHNA" (p. 223), and "Rezoning - Very Low / Low Income RHNA" (p231).Income Categories - Income Categories assigned to the parcel (relates to income capacity units)Lot Consolidation ID - Parcels with a unique identfier for consolidation potential (based on parcel ownership)Lot Consolidation Notes - Specific notes for consolidationConsolidation - Adjacent Parcels - All adjacent parcels that are tied to each lot consolidation IDsUsed in Previous Housing Elements? - These are the Very Low and Low Income level parcels that showed up in previous Housing ElementsShape_Length - Perimeter (feet)Shape_Area - Area (sq feet)*As it existed in 2021
Description: These are the submarket areas that are used to identify certain requirements from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, which was adopted on November 10, 2020 by the Board of Supervisors (for full ordinance, click here).The text below is taken from portions of the EIR:In response to the local and statewide housing crisis, the County is working to increase housing choice, affordability and livability in the unincorporated areas. One piece of the County's overall plan is the proposed IHO. Inclusionary housing ordinances have been adopted in more than 500 jurisdictions in the United States and can be an effective strategy for creating mixed-income housing projects and mitigating economic segregation by dispersing affordable housing throughout the community. The primary focus of an inclusionary housing ordinance is the provision of affordable housing units with market-rate housing developments.Given the geographic, social, and economic diversity of the unincorporated areas, submarket areas were identified based on similar land use, real estate markets, and development activities. The boundaries of each submarket area were determined to ensure that individual unincorporated areas were entirely located within one submarket area. Date added to SDE: 12/9/20
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County, Impact Sciences (EIR)
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) - </SPAN><A href="https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/ngp/national-hydrography" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>link to USGS website </SPAN></A><SPAN>- is a feature-based database that interconnects and uniquely identifies the stream segments or reaches that make up the nation's surface water drainage system. NHD data was originally developed at 1:100,000 scale and exists at that scale for the whole country. High resolution NHD adds detail to the original 1:100,000-scale NHD. (Data for Alaska, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands was developed at high-resolution, not 1:100,000 scale.) Like the 1:100,000-scale NHD, high resolution NHD contains reach codes for networked features and isolated lakes, flow direction, names, stream level, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. Reaches are also defined to represent waterbodies and the approximate shorelines of the Great Lakes, the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria set out by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN><SPAN>NHD is used with other data themes such as elevation, boundaries, and transportation to produce general reference maps. The NHD is often used by scientists using GIS technology. GIS takes advantage of a rich set of attributes that can be processed to generate specialized information. These analyses are possible because the NHD contains a flow direction network that traces the water downstream or upstream. The NHD also uses an addressing system to link specific information about the water such as discharge rates, water quality, and fish population. Using the basic NHD attributes, flow network, linked information, and other characteristics, it is possible to study cause and affect relationships such as how a source of poor water quality upstream might affect a fish population downstream. The features in the NHD are organized into polygons, lines and points. The polygons most commonly portray waterbodies such as lakes while lines commonly portray streams. The stream lines are broken into shorter segments stretching from confluence-to-confluence. The segments are then linked together to trace the flow of water across the landscape. Flowlines attributed as artificial paths are added inside water bodies to maintain the flow network.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Natural Resources Conservation Service
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) - </SPAN><A href="https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/ngp/national-hydrography" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>link to USGS website </SPAN></A><SPAN>- is a feature-based database that interconnects and uniquely identifies the stream segments or reaches that make up the nation's surface water drainage system. NHD data was originally developed at 1:100,000 scale and exists at that scale for the whole country. High resolution NHD adds detail to the original 1:100,000-scale NHD. (Data for Alaska, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands was developed at high-resolution, not 1:100,000 scale.) Like the 1:100,000-scale NHD, high resolution NHD contains reach codes for networked features and isolated lakes, flow direction, names, stream level, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. Reaches are also defined to represent waterbodies and the approximate shorelines of the Great Lakes, the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria set out by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN><SPAN>NHD is used with other data themes such as elevation, boundaries, and transportation to produce general reference maps. The NHD is often used by scientists using GIS technology. GIS takes advantage of a rich set of attributes that can be processed to generate specialized information. These analyses are possible because the NHD contains a flow direction network that traces the water downstream or upstream. The NHD also uses an addressing system to link specific information about the water such as discharge rates, water quality, and fish population. Using the basic NHD attributes, flow network, linked information, and other characteristics, it is possible to study cause and affect relationships such as how a source of poor water quality upstream might affect a fish population downstream. The features in the NHD are organized into polygons, lines and points. The polygons most commonly portray waterbodies such as lakes while lines commonly portray streams. The stream lines are broken into shorter segments stretching from confluence-to-confluence. The segments are then linked together to trace the flow of water across the landscape. Flowlines attributed as artificial paths are added inside water bodies to maintain the flow network.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN /></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN /><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Natural Resources Conservation Service
Value: CG - General Commercial Label: CG - General Commercial - [Florence-Firestone, Hacienda Heights, Santa Clarita Valley, W. Athens] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: MD - Medium Density Residential (12 to 22 du/gross ac) Label: MD - Medium Density Residential (12 to 22 du/gross ac) - [Altadena] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: NF - National Forest and National Forest Managed Lands Label: NF - National Forest and National Forest Managed Lands - [Altadena] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: NP I - Neighborhood Preservation I (1 to 6 du/ac) Label: NP I - Neighborhood Preservation I (1 to 6 du/ac) - [Walnut Park] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: NP II - Neighborhood Preservation II (6 to 12 du/ac) Label: NP II - Neighborhood Preservation II (6 to 12 du/ac) - [Walnut Park] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: P - Public and Semi-Public Facilities Label: P - Public and Semi-Public Facilities - [Santa Monica Mountains North Area & Coastal Zone] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: P-CS - Public and Semi-Public Community Serving Label: P-CS - Public and Semi-Public Community Serving - [Hacienda Heights] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: P-UF - Public and Semi-Public Utilities and Facilities Label: P-UF - Public and Semi-Public Utilities and Facilities - [Hacienda Heights] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: RD 2.3 - Single Family Residence (1 to 8 du/ac) Label: RD 2.3 - Single Family Residence (1 to 8 du/ac) - [West Athens - Westmont] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: RD 3.1 - Two Family Residence (8 to 17 du/ac) Label: RD 3.1 - Two Family Residence (8 to 17 du/ac) - [West Athens - Westmont] Description: N/A Symbol:
Value: RD 3.2 - Medium Density Bonus (17 to 30 du/ac) Label: RD 3.2 - Medium Density Bonus (17 to 30 du/ac) - [West Athens - Westmont] Description: N/A Symbol:
Name: Land Use Policy - General Plan 2035 (Boundary)
Display Field: COMM_NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: The General Plan 2035 was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on 10/6/15, and went into effect on 11/5/15. This reflects the land use policy as depicted in that plan, which is located here. This plan rescinds the 1980 General Plan, however, the old plan is still available on GIS-NET3 for reference (the 1980 General Plan document, can be accessed on GP website under the 'Resources' section).Below is the update history of any modifications / plan amendments following adoption:10/29/15 - Added to DRP SDE database.
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning - GIS Section
Los Angeles County Assessor's Office
Name: Land Use Policy - General Plan 2035 (Shading)
Display Field: COMM_NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: The General Plan 2035 was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on 10/6/15, and went into effect on 11/5/15. This reflects the land use policy as depicted in that plan, which is located here. This plan rescinds the 1980 General Plan, however, the old plan is still available on GIS-NET3 for reference (the 1980 General Plan document, can be accessed on GP website under the 'Resources' section).Below is the update history of any modifications / plan amendments following adoption:10/29/15 - Added to DRP SDE database.
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning - GIS Section
Los Angeles County Assessor's Office
Description: This layer was updated in conjunction with the update of the Marina Del Rey Local Coastal Plan, as there were parcels that were identified for modification. This layer was made official when it was Certified by the Coastal Commission, and adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 20, 2012. Additionally, the linework itself was updated for additional accuracy, using the original Lease Parcels Map from the County Engineer (originally drawn in 1960, revised in 1987), and CAD linework from Los Angeles County Public Works. A more detailed description of this update can be found in "..Parcel_Update_Methodology.docx".
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
Department of Public Works
Department of Beaches and Harbors
GIS Section
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Historic Fire Perimeters from the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Fire perimeter data exists from 1966 through last year. Fire perimeter data is collected from field personnel during a major fire incident.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Last Update: September 2022</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The data herein is for informational purposes, and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying intents. The Los Angeles County Fire Department reserves the right to change, restrict or discontinue access at any time.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: Los Angeles County Fire Department
Information Management Division
Geographic Information Systems Section
5847 Rickenbacker Road
Commerce, CA.
90040
LACoFDGIS@fire.lacounty.gov
323-890-4260
Color: [78, 78, 78, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: middle Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Arial Black Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Countywide layer which divides the County of Los Angeles into 11 Planning Areas. These area divisions were created for DRP by the GIS Section under direction from the General Plan Development Section. Reflects the most recent changes from the General Plan update (revision 5--December, 2011), imported to SDE 8/20/12. UPDATED 1/9/13 for adjustment in Los Angeles / Long Beach Harbor area (DPW linework). UPDATE HISTORY10/9/14 - copied PLANNING_AREAS and updated boundary betwen proposed Antelope Valley Area Plan and Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan.11/24/14 - updated to include La Crescenta FROM San Fernando Valley TO West San Gabriel Valley.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning GIS Section
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) - </SPAN><A href="https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/ngp/national-hydrography" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>link to USGS website </SPAN></A><SPAN>- is a feature-based database that interconnects and uniquely identifies the stream segments or reaches that make up the nation's surface water drainage system. NHD data was originally developed at 1:100,000 scale and exists at that scale for the whole country. High resolution NHD adds detail to the original 1:100,000-scale NHD. (Data for Alaska, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands was developed at high-resolution, not 1:100,000 scale.) Like the 1:100,000-scale NHD, high resolution NHD contains reach codes for networked features and isolated lakes, flow direction, names, stream level, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. Reaches are also defined to represent waterbodies and the approximate shorelines of the Great Lakes, the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria set out by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN><SPAN>NHD is used with other data themes such as elevation, boundaries, and transportation to produce general reference maps. The NHD is often used by scientists using GIS technology. GIS takes advantage of a rich set of attributes that can be processed to generate specialized information. These analyses are possible because the NHD contains a flow direction network that traces the water downstream or upstream. The NHD also uses an addressing system to link specific information about the water such as discharge rates, water quality, and fish population. Using the basic NHD attributes, flow network, linked information, and other characteristics, it is possible to study cause and affect relationships such as how a source of poor water quality upstream might affect a fish population downstream. The features in the NHD are organized into polygons, lines and points. The polygons most commonly portray waterbodies such as lakes while lines commonly portray streams. The stream lines are broken into shorter segments stretching from confluence-to-confluence. The segments are then linked together to trace the flow of water across the landscape. Flowlines attributed as artificial paths are added inside water bodies to maintain the flow network.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Natural Resources Conservation Service
Description: "Significant Ecological area (SEA)" means an area that is determined to possess an example of biotic resources that cumulatively represent biological diversity, for the purposes of protecting biotic diversity, as part of the Los Angeles County general plan or the city's general plan. UPDATED: 7/18/13
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Description: Setback Districts are defined in the Los Angeles County Code, Title 22, Chapter 22.44, Part 5. These are the full outlines of the district combined into one multi-part polygon. Imported into SDE on 6/20/16.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Description: Setback Districts are defined in the Los Angeles County Code, Title 22, Chapter 22.44, Part 5. Imported into SDE on 3/4/15 after some modifications from previously existing data.UPDATE HISTORY:3/10/15 - updated several errors in the setbacks by using a near analysis with the right-of-way lines to identify the errors.
Color: [104, 104, 104, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: The following specific plans are shown in this directory:3rd Street Specific Plan - Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.Centennial Specific Plan - Located in the northwestern portion of Antelope Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 4/30/19.Connect Southwest LA TOD - Located in the community of West Athens - Westmont, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/12/20.La Vina - located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89.Marina Del Rey - implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). Adopted 3/20/12.Newhall Ranch - a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/27/03.Northlake- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92.Santa Catalina Island - Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). Adopted 11/28/89.Universal City - adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.West Carson TOD Specific Plan - adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 10/1/19.Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan - adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 9/18/18.The following Specific Plan was taken out due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):Canyon Park - located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.UPDATE HISTORY: 9/2/14 to add Santa Catalina Island and Marina Del Rey. These two areas will show the boundary only, the Specific Land Use categories are covered under the "Area / Community / Neighborhood / Coastal Plans" layer (LUP_DRP_AREA_COMM)8/31/15 - updated Universal City for Reorganization 2014-01.6/11/20 - Connect Southwest LA TOD went into effect.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Description: The Land use for the following specific plans are shown in this directory:3rd Street Specific Plan - Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.La Vina - located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89.Marina Del Rey - implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 3/20/12.Newhall Ranch - a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/27/03.Northlake- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92Santa Catalina Island - Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program) NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 11/28/89.Universal City - adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.The following Specific Plan was taken out due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):Canyon Park - located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.
Description: The Land use for the following specific plans are shown in this directory:3rd Street Specific Plan - Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.La Vina - located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89. Amended 4/16/19 for Specific Plan Amendment 2007-00005-(5).Marina Del Rey - implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 3/20/12.Newhall Ranch - a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/27/03.Northlake- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92Santa Catalina Island - Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program) NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 11/28/89.Universal City - adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan - adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 9/18/18.The following Specific Plan was taken out due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):Canyon Park - located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.UPDATE HISTORY:8/31/15 - updated Universal City for Reorganization 2014-01.10/18/18 - Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan adoption went into effect.5/6/19 - Specific Plan Amendment for La Vina.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Description: The Land use for the following specific plans are shown in this directory:3rd Street Specific Plan - Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.La Vina - located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89. Amended 4/16/19 for Specific Plan Amendment 2007-00005-(5).Marina Del Rey - implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 3/20/12.Newhall Ranch - a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/27/03.Northlake- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92Santa Catalina Island - Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program) NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 11/28/89.Universal City - adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan - adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 9/18/18.The following Specific Plan was taken out due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):Canyon Park - located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.UPDATE HISTORY:8/31/15 - updated Universal City for Reorganization 2014-01.10/18/18 - Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan adoption went into effect.5/6/19 - Specific Plan Amendment for La Vina.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The Land use for the following specific plans are shown in this directory:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/ela" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>3rd Street Specific Plan </SPAN></A><SPAN>- Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/view/centennial_specific_plan" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Centennial Specific Plan </SPAN></A><SPAN>- Located in the northwestern portion of Antelope Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 4/30/19.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/Southwest" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Connect Southwest LA TOD </SPAN></A><SPAN>- Located in the community of West Athens - Westmont, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/12/20.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="https://planning.lacounty.gov/fftod" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Florence-Firestone TOD</SPAN></A><SPAN>- Located in the community of Florence-Firestone, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 2/7/23.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/view/la_vina_specific_plan/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>La Vina </SPAN></A><SPAN>- located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89. Amended 4/16/19 for Specific Plan Amendment 2007-00005-(5).</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/data/pd_sp_marinadelrey.pdf" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Marina Del Rey </SPAN></A><SPAN>- implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 3/20/12.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/view/newhall_ranch_specific_plan/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Newhall Ranch </SPAN></A><SPAN>- a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/27/03. Updated on 3/20/24 with the latest, parcel-specific data from the developer for Mission Village. Also, removed the outdated village names.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/view/northlake_specific_plan/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Northlake</SPAN></A><SPAN>- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/data/pd_santa-catalina-island-implementation.pdf" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Santa Catalina Island </SPAN></A><SPAN>- Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program) NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 11/28/89.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/view/nbcuniversal_evolution_plan_universal_studios_specific_plan_ordinance_speci/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Universal City </SPAN></A><SPAN>- adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/westcarson" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>West Carson TOD Specific Plan </SPAN></A><SPAN>- adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 10/1/19.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/willowbrook/tod" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan </SPAN></A><SPAN>- adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 9/18/18.</SPAN></P></LI></UL><P><SPAN>The following Specific Plan was </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">taken out </SPAN><SPAN>due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):</SPAN></P><P><A href="http://planning.lacounty.gov/view/canyon_park_specific_plan/" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Canyon Park </SPAN></A><SPAN>- located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">UPDATE HISTORY:</SPAN></P><UL><LI><P><SPAN>8/31/15 - updated Universal City for Reorganization 2014-01.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>10/18/18 - Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan adoption went into effect.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>5/6/19 - Specific Plan Amendment for La Vina.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN>6/11/20 - Connect Southwest LA TOD went into effect.</SPAN></P></LI><LI><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">3/10/23 - Florence-Firestone TOD went into effect.</SPAN></P></LI></UL></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Description: The Land use for the following specific plans are shown in this directory:3rd Street Specific Plan - Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.Centennial Specific Plan - Located in the northwestern portion of Antelope Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 4/30/19.La Vina - located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89. Amended 4/16/19 for Specific Plan Amendment 2007-00005-(5).Marina Del Rey - implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 3/20/12.Newhall Ranch - a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/27/03.Northlake- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92Santa Catalina Island - Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program) NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 11/28/89.Universal City - adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.West Carson TOD Specific Plan - adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 10/1/19.Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan - adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 9/18/18.The following Specific Plan was taken out due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):Canyon Park - located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.UPDATE HISTORY:8/31/15 - updated Universal City for Reorganization 2014-01.10/18/18 - Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan adoption went into effect.5/6/19 - Specific Plan Amendment for La Vina.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Description: The Land use for the following specific plans are shown in this directory:3rd Street Specific Plan - Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.La Vina - located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89.Marina Del Rey - implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 3/20/12.Newhall Ranch - a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 5/27/03.Northlake- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92Santa Catalina Island - Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program) NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 11/28/89.Universal City - adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.Willowbrook TOD Specific Plan - adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 9/18/18.The following Specific Plan was taken out due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):Canyon Park - located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.UPDATE HISTORY:8/31/15 - updated Universal City for Reorganization 2014-01.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 20001.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FullName] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 20001.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FullName] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 20001.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FullName] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 40000.0 Max. Scale: 20000.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FullName] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 7 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 40000.0 Max. Scale: 20000.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FullName] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 75000.0 Max. Scale: 40000.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FullName] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 7 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 75000.0 Max. Scale: 40000.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FULLNAME] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 200000.0 Max. Scale: 75001.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FULLNAME] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 6 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Tracks Subdivisions for all unincorporated areas in Los Angeles County (and a few contracted cities) taken in by the Department of Regional Planning. Current as of December, 2010.
Copyright Text: County of Los Angeles
Department of Regional Planning
GIS Section
Color: [223, 115, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: The Land use for the following specific plans are shown in this directory:3rd Street Specific Plan - Located in the East Los Angeles Community Plan, adopted by Board of Supervisors - 11/12/14.La Vina - located in the community of Altadena, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/26/89.Marina Del Rey - implements the Marina Del Rey Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program). NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 3/20/12.Newhall Ranch - a large planned community in Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/27/03.Northlake- located in the Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 6/1/92Santa Catalina Island - Implements the Santa Catalina Island Land Use Plan (within the Local Coastal Program) NOTE: THIS IS THE BOUNDARY ONLY - SEE LAND USE POLICY LAYER FOR CATEGORIES. Adopted 11/28/89.Universal City - adopted by Board of Supervisors - 4/30/13.The following Specific Plan was taken out due to an annexation to the City of Santa Clarita on 10/2/12 (recorded on 9/11/2):Canyon Park - located in the community of Santa Clarita Valley, adopted by the Board of Supervisors - 12/23/86.
